
11-22-2004, 06:34 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Digital Cuttlefish
It is not a matter of boundaries, it is a matter of data and evidence. If we do not have evidence about a particular question, we cannot answer it. It is that simple. You, on the other hand, are answering questions well beyond what "data" (I use the term at its very loosest) should allow you. So, "out of bounds" seems a foreign concept to you.
|
That's okay, it's not important anyway.
Quote:
|
No. I am guessing that everyone here (yourself included, if you were to answer honestly) knows that what I am saying is that you are putting words into the mouths of scientists, words which they themselves have not uttered. You are then able to say "how foolish those words are!" as if you are saying something important.
|
You're right, I have nothing to say.
Quote:
|
You are correct in one thing--the words you are reacting to are illogical. Trouble is...they are your words, and yours alone.
|
Go ahead, believe what you want to believe.
__________________
So when the body dies, and consciousness departs, where do "we" go? ... Off to define another "reality" perhaps?
|